Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Grand island, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Grand island, NE.
| Data | Andrew | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 52,513 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $59,061 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Grand island
- The population in Grand island is higher at 52,513, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- Residents in Andrew have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 35.0 years in Grand island.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613 compared to $59,061 in Grand island.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 37.0% in Grand island.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand island at 10%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Grand island has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Grand island provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 98 | 52 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Grand island
- In Grand island, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 52% in Grand island.
- In Grand island, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Andrew.
- Grand island has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Grand island at 8%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- In Grand island, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Andrew.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 41.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Grand island
- More residents in Andrew report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.2% in Grand island.
- Depression is more prevalent in Andrew at 18.3% compared to 17.0% in Grand island.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Andrew at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Grand island.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 18.2% in Grand island.
- Grand island has higher obesity rates at 41.0% compared to 35.2% in Andrew.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand island at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Grand island |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.8% (1,457) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 16.6% (8,733) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 20.3% (10,649) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 13.3% (6,981) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Grand island
- In Grand island, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 16.6% in Grand island.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grand island at 20.3%, compared to 11.6% in Andrew.
- In Grand island, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.