Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Fleischmanns, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Fleischmanns, NY.
| Data | Andrew | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 230 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 49.5 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $60,417 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Fleischmanns
- In Andrew, the population is higher at 378, compared to 230 in Fleischmanns.
- The median age in Fleischmanns is higher at 49.5 years, compared to 39.8 years in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613 compared to $60,417 in Fleischmanns.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 40.0% in Fleischmanns.
- The poverty level is higher in Fleischmanns at 10%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Fleischmanns has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Fleischmanns provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 98 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 35 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Fleischmanns
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Andrew and Fleischmanns at 0%.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 54% in Fleischmanns.
- Both Andrew and Fleischmanns have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fleischmanns has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 35%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fleischmanns at 7%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- In Fleischmanns, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Andrew.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 23.7% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 35.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Fleischmanns
- In Fleischmanns, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.2% in Andrew.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fleischmanns at 23.7% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Fleischmanns has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Andrew.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 17.0% in Fleischmanns.
- Obesity rates are higher in Andrew at 35.2% compared to 35.0% in Fleischmanns.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fleischmanns at 24.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Fleischmanns |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 4.3% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 20.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 21.7% (50) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 37.0% (85) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Fleischmanns
- In Fleischmanns, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.3% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 20.0% in Fleischmanns.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fleischmanns at 21.7%, compared to 11.6% in Andrew.
- In Fleischmanns, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.0% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.