Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Cowden, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Cowden, IL.
| Data | Andrew | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 378 | 507 |
| Median Age | 39.8 years | 30.9 years |
| Median Income | $61,613 | $43,750 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Andrew vs Cowden
- The population in Cowden is higher at 507, compared to 378 in Andrew.
- Residents in Andrew have a higher median age of 39.8 years compared to 30.9 years in Cowden.
- Andrew has a higher median income of $61,613 compared to $43,750 in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 29.0% in Cowden.
- The poverty level is higher in Cowden at 10%, compared to 9% in Andrew.
- Cowden has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.
Demographics
Demographics Andrew vs Cowden provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Andrew | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 98 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Cowden
- In Cowden, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Andrew.
- Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 89% in Cowden.
- Both Andrew and Cowden have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Cowden has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cowden at 3%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
- In Cowden, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Andrew.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Andrew | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.4% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Cowden
- In Cowden, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Andrew.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cowden at 22.3% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
- Cowden has a higher smoking rate at 19.5% compared to 17.4% in Andrew.
- Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 18.2% in Cowden.
- Cowden has higher obesity rates at 36.5% compared to 35.2% in Andrew.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cowden at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Andrew.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Andrew | Cowden |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 25.1% (95) | 22.5% (114) |
| Less than High School | 11.6% (44) | 5.7% (29) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.5% (32) | 6.9% (35) |
Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Cowden
- In Cowden, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 22.5% in Cowden.
- More residents in Andrew have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 5.7% in Cowden.
- A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.5% compared to 6.9% in Cowden.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.