Demographics details for Andrew, IA vs Broadview heights, OH

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Andrew, IA vs Broadview heights, OH.

Data Andrew Broadview heights
Population 378 19,635
Median Age 39.8 years 45.0 years
Median Income $61,613 $97,902
Married Families 51.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 9% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.0

Population Comparison: Andrew vs Broadview heights

  • The population in Broadview heights is higher at 19,635, compared to 378 in Andrew.
  • The median age in Broadview heights is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 39.8 years in Andrew.
  • Broadview heights has a higher median income of $97,902, compared to $61,613 in Andrew.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Andrew at 51.0% compared to 47.0% in Broadview heights.
  • Andrew has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Broadview heights.
  • Broadview heights has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 2.5% in Andrew.

Demographics

Demographics Andrew vs Broadview heights provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Andrew Broadview heights
Black Data is updating 3
White 98 85
Asian Data is updating 6
Hispanic 1 2
Two or More Races 1 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Andrew vs Broadview heights

  • In Broadview heights, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in Andrew.
  • Andrew has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 85% in Broadview heights.
  • In Broadview heights, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Andrew.
  • Broadview heights has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Broadview heights at 4%, compared to 1% in Andrew.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andrew and Broadview heights at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Andrew Broadview heights
Mental Health Not Good 15.2% 14.0%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 8.6%
Depression 18.3% 23.0%
Smoking 17.4% 12.8%
Binge Drinking 23.4% 20.7%
Obesity 35.2% 27.3%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Andrew vs Broadview heights

  • More residents in Andrew report poor mental health at 15.2% compared to 14.0% in Broadview heights.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Broadview heights at 23.0% versus 18.3% in Andrew.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Andrew at 17.4% compared to 12.8% in Broadview heights.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Andrew at 23.4% compared to 20.7% in Broadview heights.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Andrew at 35.2% compared to 27.3% in Broadview heights.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Andrew and Broadview heights at 8.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Andrew Broadview heights
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.0% (191)
High School Diploma 25.1% (95) 10.9% (2,149)
Less than High School 11.6% (44) 3.8% (746)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.5% (32) 39.1% (7,676)

Education Levels Comparison: Andrew vs Broadview heights

  • In Broadview heights, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.0% in Andrew.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Andrew hold a high school diploma at 25.1% compared to 10.9% in Broadview heights.
  • More residents in Andrew have less than a high school education at 11.6% compared to 3.8% in Broadview heights.
  • In Broadview heights, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.1% compared to 8.5% in Andrew.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.