Demographics details for Andover, CT vs Severna park, MD

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Andover, CT vs Severna park, MD.

Data Andover Severna park
Population 3,231 40,452
Median Age 42.0 years 41.5 years
Median Income $98,000 $164,288
Married Families 70.0% 48.0%
Poverty Level 5% 3%
Unemployment Rate 2.2 3.2

Population Comparison: Andover vs Severna park

  • The population in Severna park is higher at 40,452, compared to 3,231 in Andover.
  • Residents in Andover have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 41.5 years in Severna park.
  • Severna park has a higher median income of $164,288, compared to $98,000 in Andover.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Andover at 70.0% compared to 48.0% in Severna park.
  • Andover has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 3% in Severna park.
  • Severna park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.2% in Andover.

Demographics

Demographics Andover vs Severna park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Andover Severna park
Black 1 3
White 95 86
Asian 2 3
Hispanic 1 3
Two or More Races 1 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Andover vs Severna park

  • In Severna park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Andover.
  • Andover has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 86% in Severna park.
  • In Severna park, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Andover.
  • Severna park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Andover.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Severna park at 5%, compared to 1% in Andover.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Andover and Severna park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Andover Severna park
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.3%
Depression Data is updating% 19.9%
Smoking Data is updating% 9.0%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 31.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Andover vs Severna park

  • In Severna park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.1% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Severna park at 19.9% versus 0.0% in Andover.
  • Severna park has a higher smoking rate at 9.0% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Severna park at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • Severna park has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Severna park at 8.0% compared to 0.0% in Andover.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Andover Severna park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (145)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 10.9% (4,392)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 4.3% (1,731)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 38.1% (15,411)

Education Levels Comparison: Andover vs Severna park

  • In Severna park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • In Severna park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.9% compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Severna park at 4.3%, compared to 0.0% in Andover.
  • In Severna park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 0.0% in Andover.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.