Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Yakima, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Yakima, WA.
| Data | Anderson | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,771 | 97,012 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 33.9 years |
| Median Income | $40,445 | $55,734 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Yakima
- The population in Yakima is higher at 97,012, compared to 29,771 in Anderson.
- The median age in Yakima is higher at 33.9 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Yakima has a higher median income of $55,734, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Yakima, the percentage of married families is higher at 33.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 14% in Anderson.
- Yakima has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.3% in Anderson.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Yakima provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 34 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 47 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Yakima
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 34% in Yakima.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 2% compared to 1% in Yakima.
- Yakima has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 4% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yakima at 16%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- In Yakima, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 17.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.4% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Yakima
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.5% in Yakima.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Yakima at 23.6% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 17.4% in Yakima.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anderson at 15.7% compared to 15.4% in Yakima.
- Yakima has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 39.6% in Anderson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 16.0% in Yakima.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Yakima |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 1.8% (1,748) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 13.4% (12,983) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 27.9% (27,106) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 12.1% (11,743) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Yakima
- In Yakima, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 13.4% in Yakima.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yakima at 27.9%, compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 12.1% in Yakima.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.