Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Wichita falls, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Wichita falls, TX.
Data | Anderson | Wichita falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,771 | 102,664 |
Median Age | 32.7 years | 32.8 years |
Median Income | $40,445 | $55,584 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Wichita falls
- The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 29,771 in Anderson.
- The median age in Wichita falls is higher at 32.8 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Wichita falls has a higher median income of $55,584, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Wichita falls, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Anderson and Wichita falls at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.9% in Wichita falls.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anderson | Wichita falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 28 | 12 |
White | 61 | 54 |
Asian | 2 | 3 |
Hispanic | 4 | 22 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Wichita falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 12% in Wichita falls.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
- In Wichita falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Anderson.
- Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 4% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wichita falls at 8%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anderson | Wichita falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 12.5% |
Depression | 22.6% | 24.6% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 18.7% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 37.1% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Wichita falls
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.3% in Wichita falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Wichita falls at 24.6% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 18.6% in Wichita falls.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 15.7% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 39.6% compared to 37.1% in Wichita falls.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Wichita falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anderson | Wichita falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 1.0% (1,035) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 15.1% (15,510) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 14.6% (14,970) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 15.1% (15,550) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Wichita falls
- In Wichita falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wichita falls at 14.6%, compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.