Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Sumrall, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Sumrall, MS.
| Data | Anderson | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,771 | 1,911 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $40,445 | $82,292 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Sumrall
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 29,771, compared to 1,911 in Sumrall.
- The median age in Sumrall is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Sumrall has a higher median income of $82,292, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Sumrall, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Sumrall.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.4% in Sumrall.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Sumrall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 22 |
| White | 61 | 73 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Sumrall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 22% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sumrall at 73% compared to 61% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 2% compared to 0% in Sumrall.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 4% compared to 2% in Sumrall.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anderson at 5% compared to 3% in Sumrall.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Sumrall at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.2% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Sumrall
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.5% in Sumrall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sumrall at 22.8% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 16.1% in Sumrall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sumrall at 15.9% compared to 15.7% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 39.6% compared to 37.2% in Sumrall.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sumrall at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Sumrall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 0.5% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 15.0% (286) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 3.5% (67) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 17.1% (326) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Sumrall
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.5% in Sumrall.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 15.0% in Sumrall.
- More residents in Anderson have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 3.5% in Sumrall.
- In Sumrall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 15.8% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.