Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Sulphur, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Sulphur, OK.
| Data | Anderson | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,771 | 4,951 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $40,445 | $55,951 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Sulphur
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 29,771, compared to 4,951 in Sulphur.
- The median age in Sulphur is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $55,951, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is identical in both Anderson and Sulphur at 14%.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Sulphur.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 2 |
| White | 61 | 60 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 16 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 10 |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Sulphur
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 60% in Sulphur.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 2% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sulphur at 16%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 10%, compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 19.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 14.6% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 40.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Sulphur
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Anderson and Sulphur at 19.2%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 25.3% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 21.4% in Sulphur.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anderson at 15.7% compared to 14.6% in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 40.7% compared to 39.6% in Anderson.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 1.8% (88) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 18.2% (899) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 18.1% (898) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 10.9% (542) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.2% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 18.1%, compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 10.9% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.