Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Murrieta, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Murrieta, CA.
Data | Anderson | Murrieta |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,771 | 113,783 |
Median Age | 32.7 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $40,445 | $106,925 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Murrieta
- The population in Murrieta is higher at 113,783, compared to 29,771 in Anderson.
- The median age in Murrieta is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Murrieta has a higher median income of $106,925, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Murrieta, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 9% in Murrieta.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 4.3% in Murrieta.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Murrieta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anderson | Murrieta |
---|---|---|
Black | 28 | 5 |
White | 61 | 38 |
Asian | 2 | 8 |
Hispanic | 4 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Murrieta
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 5% in Murrieta.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 38% in Murrieta.
- In Murrieta, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Anderson.
- Murrieta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 4% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Murrieta at 15%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Murrieta at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anderson | Murrieta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 15.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.7% |
Depression | 22.6% | 17.3% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 11.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 32.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Murrieta
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 15.0% in Murrieta.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anderson at 22.6% compared to 17.3% in Murrieta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 11.3% in Murrieta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Murrieta at 17.6% compared to 15.7% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 39.6% compared to 32.5% in Murrieta.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Murrieta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anderson | Murrieta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 1.2% (1,387) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 11.8% (13,439) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 8.4% (9,580) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 18.6% (21,123) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Murrieta
- In Murrieta, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 15.2% compared to 11.8% in Murrieta.
- More residents in Anderson have less than a high school education at 11.9% compared to 8.4% in Murrieta.
- In Murrieta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.