Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Kilmarnock, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Kilmarnock, VA.
| Data | Anderson | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,771 | 1,428 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 60.2 years |
| Median Income | $40,445 | $36,875 |
| Married Families | 28.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Kilmarnock
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 29,771, compared to 1,428 in Kilmarnock.
- The median age in Kilmarnock is higher at 60.2 years, compared to 32.7 years in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher median income of $40,445 compared to $36,875 in Kilmarnock.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Anderson at 28.0% compared to 27.0% in Kilmarnock.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 11% in Kilmarnock.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.4% in Kilmarnock.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Kilmarnock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 23 |
| White | 61 | 74 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Kilmarnock
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 23% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kilmarnock at 74% compared to 61% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 2% compared to 1% in Kilmarnock.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 4% compared to 0% in Kilmarnock.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anderson at 5% compared to 2% in Kilmarnock.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Kilmarnock at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 21.5% | 17.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Kilmarnock
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kilmarnock at 22.8% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 17.1% in Kilmarnock.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Anderson and Kilmarnock at 15.7%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 39.6% compared to 38.0% in Kilmarnock.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kilmarnock at 19.0% compared to 17.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Kilmarnock |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 3.0% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 20.7% (295) |
| Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 22.0% (314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 17.2% (245) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Kilmarnock
- In Kilmarnock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- In Kilmarnock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.7% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kilmarnock at 22.0%, compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- In Kilmarnock, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.2% compared to 15.8% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.