Demographics details for Anderson, SC vs Clifton hill, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, SC vs Clifton hill, MO.
Data | Anderson | Clifton hill |
---|---|---|
Population | 29,771 | 87 |
Median Age | 32.7 years | 28.3 years |
Median Income | $40,445 | $45,500 |
Married Families | 28.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 14% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Clifton hill
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 29,771, compared to 87 in Clifton hill.
- Residents in Anderson have a higher median age of 32.7 years compared to 28.3 years in Clifton hill.
- Clifton hill has a higher median income of $45,500, compared to $40,445 in Anderson.
- In Clifton hill, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 28.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 10% in Clifton hill.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 5.3%, compared to 3.5% in Clifton hill.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Clifton hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anderson | Clifton hill |
---|---|---|
Black | 28 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 94 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 28% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clifton hill at 94% compared to 61% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 2% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 4% compared to 0% in Clifton hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clifton hill at 6%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Clifton hill at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anderson | Clifton hill |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 14.3% |
Depression | 22.6% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 21.4% |
Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.0% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 41.6% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Clifton hill
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 17.9% in Clifton hill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clifton hill at 25.9% versus 22.6% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 21.5% compared to 21.4% in Clifton hill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clifton hill at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Anderson.
- Clifton hill has higher obesity rates at 41.6% compared to 39.6% in Anderson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 17.0% compared to 6.0% in Clifton hill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anderson | Clifton hill |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (234) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 15.2% (4,532) | 26.4% (23) |
Less than High School | 11.9% (3,538) | 13.8% (12) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.8% (4,718) | 3.4% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Clifton hill
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Clifton hill.
- In Clifton hill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 15.2% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clifton hill at 13.8%, compared to 11.9% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.8% compared to 3.4% in Clifton hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.