Demographics details for Anderson, IN vs Water valley, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, IN vs Water valley, MS.
| Data | Anderson | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,099 | 3,361 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $44,974 | $45,718 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Water valley
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 55,099, compared to 3,361 in Water valley.
- Residents in Anderson have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 35.8 years in Water valley.
- Water valley has a higher median income of $45,718, compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Anderson at 31.0% compared to 27.0% in Water valley.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 4.3% in Water valley.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Water valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 49 |
| White | 72 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Water valley
- In Water valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 49% compared to 15% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 49% in Water valley.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 1% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 7% compared to 2% in Water valley.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anderson at 5% compared to 0% in Water valley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Water valley at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 13.8% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 12.9% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Water valley
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 18.2% in Water valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anderson at 27.1% compared to 22.0% in Water valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 25.1% compared to 23.1% in Water valley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anderson at 15.0% compared to 12.9% in Water valley.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 46.2% compared to 44.0% in Water valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 14.0% in Water valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Water valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (436) | 1.0% (34) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (12,278) | 24.0% (805) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (8,680) | 13.0% (437) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,109) | 9.6% (322) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Water valley
- In Water valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- In Water valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.0% compared to 22.3% in Anderson.
- More residents in Anderson have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 13.0% in Water valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 9.6% in Water valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.