Demographics details for Anderson, IN vs Mentor, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, IN vs Mentor, MN.
Data | Anderson | Mentor |
---|---|---|
Population | 55,099 | 105 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 52.5 years |
Median Income | $44,974 | $39,583 |
Married Families | 31.0% | 54.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Mentor
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 55,099, compared to 105 in Mentor.
- The median age in Mentor is higher at 52.5 years, compared to 38.8 years in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher median income of $44,974 compared to $39,583 in Mentor.
- In Mentor, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 2.5% in Mentor.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Mentor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anderson | Mentor |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | Data is updating |
White | 72 | 100 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 7 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Mentor
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 15% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mentor at 100% compared to 72% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 1% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 7% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anderson at 5% compared to 0% in Mentor.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Mentor at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anderson | Mentor |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.9% |
Depression | 27.1% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 25.1% | 19.6% |
Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 21.8% |
Obesity | 46.2% | 39.7% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Mentor
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 15.5% in Mentor.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anderson at 27.1% compared to 24.4% in Mentor.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 25.1% compared to 19.6% in Mentor.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mentor at 21.8% compared to 15.0% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 46.2% compared to 39.7% in Mentor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 19.0% in Mentor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anderson | Mentor |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.8% (436) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (12,278) | 43.8% (46) |
Less than High School | 15.8% (8,680) | 30.5% (32) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,109) | 6.7% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Mentor
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Mentor.
- In Mentor, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 43.8% compared to 22.3% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mentor at 30.5%, compared to 15.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 6.7% in Mentor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.