Demographics details for Anderson, IN vs Keyport, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, IN vs Keyport, WA.
| Data | Anderson | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,099 | 284 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 57.0 years |
| Median Income | $44,974 | $128,221 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Keyport
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 55,099, compared to 284 in Keyport.
- The median age in Keyport is higher at 57.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Anderson.
- Keyport has a higher median income of $128,221, compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- In Keyport, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.0% in Keyport.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Keyport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 72 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Keyport
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 15% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Keyport at 95% compared to 72% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 1% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 7% compared to 5% in Keyport.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anderson at 5% compared to 0% in Keyport.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anderson and Keyport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 9.2% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 26.4% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Keyport
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 14.9% in Keyport.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anderson at 27.1% compared to 26.4% in Keyport.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 25.1% compared to 11.5% in Keyport.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Keyport at 18.9% compared to 15.0% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 46.2% compared to 30.8% in Keyport.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Keyport at 24.0% compared to 22.0% in Anderson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Keyport |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (436) | 6.0% (17) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (12,278) | 8.8% (25) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (8,680) | 12.0% (34) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,109) | 37.3% (106) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Keyport
- In Keyport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 6.0% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 8.8% in Keyport.
- More residents in Anderson have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 12.0% in Keyport.
- In Keyport, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.3% compared to 11.1% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.