Demographics details for Anderson, IN vs Gresham, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, IN vs Gresham, OR.
| Data | Anderson | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,099 | 111,621 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $44,974 | $69,437 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Gresham
- The population in Gresham is higher at 111,621, compared to 55,099 in Anderson.
- Residents in Anderson have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 37.3 years in Gresham.
- Gresham has a higher median income of $69,437, compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- In Gresham, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 12% in Anderson.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.9% in Gresham.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Gresham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 4 |
| White | 72 | 55 |
| Asian | 1 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 22 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Gresham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 15% compared to 4% in Gresham.
- Anderson has a higher percentage of White residents at 72% compared to 55% in Gresham.
- In Gresham, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 1% in Anderson.
- Gresham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 7% in Anderson.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gresham at 13%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- In Gresham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 28.4% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 20.2% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 28.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 19.5% in Anderson.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gresham at 28.4% versus 27.1% in Anderson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 25.1% compared to 17.6% in Gresham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Gresham at 20.2% compared to 15.0% in Anderson.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 46.2% compared to 28.6% in Gresham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Gresham |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (436) | 1.6% (1,757) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (12,278) | 15.0% (16,776) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (8,680) | 16.5% (18,399) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,109) | 16.2% (18,082) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Gresham
- In Gresham, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 15.0% in Gresham.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gresham at 16.5%, compared to 15.8% in Anderson.
- In Gresham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.2% compared to 11.1% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.