Demographics details for Anderson, IN vs Central city, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anderson, IN vs Central city, KY.
| Data | Anderson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 55,099 | 5,810 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $44,974 | $52,184 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Anderson vs Central city
- In Anderson, the population is higher at 55,099, compared to 5,810 in Central city.
- Residents in Anderson have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 33.5 years in Central city.
- Central city has a higher median income of $52,184, compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- In Central city, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Central city at 16%, compared to 12% in Anderson.
- The unemployment rate in Anderson is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Central city.
Demographics
Demographics Anderson vs Central city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anderson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 3 |
| White | 72 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anderson vs Central city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anderson at 15% compared to 3% in Central city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Central city at 88% compared to 72% in Anderson.
- The Asian population is larger in Anderson at 1% compared to 0% in Central city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anderson at 7% compared to 2% in Central city.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central city at 6%, compared to 5% in Anderson.
- In Central city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anderson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.7% | 15.5% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 25.1% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.0% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 46.2% | 41.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anderson vs Central city
- More residents in Anderson report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 19.3% in Central city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anderson at 27.1% compared to 26.8% in Central city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anderson at 25.1% compared to 24.8% in Central city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anderson at 15.0% compared to 14.8% in Central city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anderson at 46.2% compared to 41.9% in Central city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 15.0% in Central city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anderson | Central city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (436) | 1.1% (65) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (12,278) | 15.4% (897) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (8,680) | 15.6% (905) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.1% (6,109) | 8.3% (480) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anderson vs Central city
- In Central city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.8% in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 15.4% in Central city.
- More residents in Anderson have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Central city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anderson hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 8.3% in Central city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.