Demographics details for Anchorage, AK vs Suffolk, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anchorage, AK vs Suffolk, VA.
Data | Anchorage | Suffolk |
---|---|---|
Population | 287,145 | 98,537 |
Median Age | 34.5 years | 38.5 years |
Median Income | $95,731 | $87,758 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Anchorage vs Suffolk
- In Anchorage, the population is higher at 287,145, compared to 98,537 in Suffolk.
- The median age in Suffolk is higher at 38.5 years, compared to 34.5 years in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher median income of $95,731 compared to $87,758 in Suffolk.
- In Suffolk, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Suffolk.
- The unemployment rate in Anchorage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Suffolk.
Demographics
Demographics Anchorage vs Suffolk provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Anchorage | Suffolk |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 40 |
White | 55 | 47 |
Asian | 10 | 2 |
Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 6 |
American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anchorage vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 5% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 47% in Suffolk.
- The Asian population is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 2% in Suffolk.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 5% in Suffolk.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anchorage at 13% compared to 6% in Suffolk.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anchorage at 7% compared to 0% in Suffolk.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Anchorage | Suffolk |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.6% |
Depression | 19.5% | 21.4% |
Smoking | 14.9% | 15.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.6% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 42.4% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anchorage vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 14.5% in Anchorage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Suffolk at 21.4% versus 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Suffolk has a higher smoking rate at 15.3% compared to 14.9% in Anchorage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anchorage at 17.8% compared to 16.6% in Suffolk.
- Suffolk has higher obesity rates at 42.4% compared to 32.9% in Anchorage.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Anchorage and Suffolk at 11.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Anchorage | Suffolk |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (1,971) | 1.0% (965) |
High School Diploma | 13.5% (38,782) | 14.9% (14,643) |
Less than High School | 5.8% (16,779) | 7.8% (7,701) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (71,274) | 21.0% (20,740) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anchorage vs Suffolk
- In Suffolk, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Anchorage.
- In Suffolk, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.5% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Suffolk at 7.8%, compared to 5.8% in Anchorage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 21.0% in Suffolk.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.