Demographics details for Anchorage, AK vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anchorage, AK vs Hoover, AL.
| Data | Anchorage | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 287,145 | 92,435 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $95,731 | $101,765 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Anchorage vs Hoover
- In Anchorage, the population is higher at 287,145, compared to 92,435 in Hoover.
- The median age in Hoover is higher at 38.3 years, compared to 34.5 years in Anchorage.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765, compared to $95,731 in Anchorage.
- In Hoover, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 39.0% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Hoover.
- The unemployment rate in Anchorage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Anchorage vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anchorage | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 20 |
| White | 55 | 67 |
| Asian | 10 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 3 |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anchorage vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 5% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hoover at 67% compared to 55% in Anchorage.
- The Asian population is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anchorage at 13% compared to 3% in Hoover.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anchorage at 7% compared to 0% in Hoover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anchorage | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anchorage vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Anchorage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anchorage at 14.9% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anchorage at 17.8% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anchorage at 32.9% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anchorage at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anchorage | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,971) | 0.6% (583) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (38,782) | 7.3% (6,787) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (16,779) | 3.8% (3,478) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (71,274) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anchorage vs Hoover
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Hoover.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage hold a high school diploma at 13.5% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- More residents in Anchorage have less than a high school education at 5.8% compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 24.8% in Anchorage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.