Demographics details for Anchorage, AK vs Fishkill, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anchorage, AK vs Fishkill, NY.
| Data | Anchorage | Fishkill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 287,145 | 2,156 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 47.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,731 | $94,205 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Anchorage vs Fishkill
- In Anchorage, the population is higher at 287,145, compared to 2,156 in Fishkill.
- The median age in Fishkill is higher at 47.1 years, compared to 34.5 years in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher median income of $95,731 compared to $94,205 in Fishkill.
- In Fishkill, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 39.0% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 5% in Fishkill.
- The unemployment rate in Anchorage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Fishkill.
Demographics
Demographics Anchorage vs Fishkill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anchorage | Fishkill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 7 |
| White | 55 | 70 |
| Asian | 10 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 10 | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
| American Indian | 7 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Anchorage vs Fishkill
- In Fishkill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 7% compared to 5% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fishkill at 70% compared to 55% in Anchorage.
- The Asian population is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 2% in Fishkill.
- Fishkill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 10% in Anchorage.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anchorage at 13% compared to 8% in Fishkill.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anchorage at 7% compared to 2% in Fishkill.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anchorage | Fishkill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 14.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 15.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 16.5% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 29.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anchorage vs Fishkill
- More residents in Anchorage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 14.4% in Fishkill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fishkill at 21.3% versus 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Fishkill has a higher smoking rate at 15.6% compared to 14.9% in Anchorage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anchorage at 17.8% compared to 16.5% in Fishkill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anchorage at 32.9% compared to 29.9% in Fishkill.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishkill at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Anchorage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anchorage | Fishkill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,971) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (38,782) | 16.2% (349) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (16,779) | 15.4% (331) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (71,274) | 38.2% (824) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anchorage vs Fishkill
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Fishkill.
- In Fishkill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.2% compared to 13.5% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fishkill at 15.4%, compared to 5.8% in Anchorage.
- In Fishkill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.2% compared to 24.8% in Anchorage.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.