Demographics details for Anchorage, AK vs Eatonton, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anchorage, AK vs Eatonton, GA.
| Data | Anchorage | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 287,145 | 6,545 |
| Median Age | 34.5 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $95,731 | $53,870 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Anchorage vs Eatonton
- In Anchorage, the population is higher at 287,145, compared to 6,545 in Eatonton.
- The median age in Eatonton is higher at 41.1 years, compared to 34.5 years in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher median income of $95,731 compared to $53,870 in Eatonton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Anchorage at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Eatonton.
- The poverty level is higher in Eatonton at 14%, compared to 11% in Anchorage.
- The unemployment rate in Anchorage is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Eatonton.
Demographics
Demographics Anchorage vs Eatonton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anchorage | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 56 |
| White | 55 | 44 |
| Asian | 10 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 10 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 13 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 7 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anchorage vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 5% in Anchorage.
- Anchorage has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 44% in Eatonton.
- The Asian population is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anchorage at 10% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anchorage at 13% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anchorage at 7% compared to 0% in Eatonton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anchorage | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.5% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 19.5% | 20.6% |
| Smoking | 14.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.8% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 43.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anchorage vs Eatonton
- In Eatonton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 14.5% in Anchorage.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eatonton at 20.6% versus 19.5% in Anchorage.
- Eatonton has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 14.9% in Anchorage.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anchorage at 17.8% compared to 12.8% in Eatonton.
- Eatonton has higher obesity rates at 43.6% compared to 32.9% in Anchorage.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Eatonton at 22.0% compared to 11.0% in Anchorage.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anchorage | Eatonton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (1,971) | 0.2% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 13.5% (38,782) | 27.1% (1,772) |
| Less than High School | 5.8% (16,779) | 6.1% (402) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.8% (71,274) | 13.7% (895) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anchorage vs Eatonton
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Eatonton.
- In Eatonton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.1% compared to 13.5% in Anchorage.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eatonton at 6.1%, compared to 5.8% in Anchorage.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anchorage hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 13.7% in Eatonton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.