Demographics details for Anamosa, IA vs Pflugerville, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anamosa, IA vs Pflugerville, TX.
| Data | Anamosa | Pflugerville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,521 | 65,556 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $55,934 | $111,151 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Anamosa vs Pflugerville
- The population in Pflugerville is higher at 65,556, compared to 5,521 in Anamosa.
- Residents in Anamosa have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.1 years in Pflugerville.
- Pflugerville has a higher median income of $111,151, compared to $55,934 in Anamosa.
- In Pflugerville, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 30.0% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 6% in Pflugerville.
- Pflugerville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Anamosa.
Demographics
Demographics Anamosa vs Pflugerville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anamosa | Pflugerville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 17 |
| White | 87 | 28 |
| Asian | 2 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anamosa vs Pflugerville
- In Pflugerville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 6% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 28% in Pflugerville.
- In Pflugerville, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Anamosa.
- Pflugerville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pflugerville at 14%, compared to 3% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anamosa and Pflugerville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anamosa | Pflugerville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.5% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 11.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 19.9% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anamosa vs Pflugerville
- More residents in Anamosa report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 15.2% in Pflugerville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pflugerville at 20.8% versus 18.7% in Anamosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anamosa at 21.1% compared to 11.5% in Pflugerville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anamosa at 21.0% compared to 19.9% in Pflugerville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anamosa at 45.0% compared to 28.2% in Pflugerville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anamosa at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Pflugerville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anamosa | Pflugerville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 0.8% (519) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (1,229) | 12.1% (7,925) |
| Less than High School | 10.5% (581) | 7.6% (4,951) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (747) | 27.3% (17,919) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anamosa vs Pflugerville
- In Pflugerville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Anamosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anamosa hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 12.1% in Pflugerville.
- More residents in Anamosa have less than a high school education at 10.5% compared to 7.6% in Pflugerville.
- In Pflugerville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.3% compared to 13.5% in Anamosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.