Demographics details for Anamosa, IA vs Harlingen, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anamosa, IA vs Harlingen, TX.
| Data | Anamosa | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,521 | 71,678 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 33.2 years |
| Median Income | $55,934 | $50,367 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Anamosa vs Harlingen
- The population in Harlingen is higher at 71,678, compared to 5,521 in Anamosa.
- Residents in Anamosa have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 33.2 years in Harlingen.
- Anamosa has a higher median income of $55,934 compared to $50,367 in Harlingen.
- In Harlingen, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 30.0% in Anamosa.
- The poverty level is higher in Harlingen at 18%, compared to 8% in Anamosa.
- Harlingen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Anamosa.
Demographics
Demographics Anamosa vs Harlingen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anamosa | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | 2 |
| White | 87 | -5 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 83 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 19 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anamosa vs Harlingen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anamosa at 6% compared to 2% in Harlingen.
- Anamosa has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to -5% in Harlingen.
- The Asian population is larger in Anamosa at 2% compared to 1% in Harlingen.
- Harlingen has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 83%, compared to 2% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Harlingen at 19%, compared to 3% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anamosa and Harlingen at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anamosa | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 44.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anamosa vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 16.0% in Anamosa.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harlingen at 20.1% versus 18.7% in Anamosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anamosa at 21.1% compared to 16.7% in Harlingen.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anamosa at 21.0% compared to 16.3% in Harlingen.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anamosa at 45.0% compared to 44.2% in Harlingen.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlingen at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Anamosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anamosa | Harlingen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 2.1% (1,536) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (1,229) | 13.6% (9,737) |
| Less than High School | 10.5% (581) | 26.2% (18,783) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (747) | 12.8% (9,208) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anamosa vs Harlingen
- In Harlingen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.2% in Anamosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anamosa hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 13.6% in Harlingen.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harlingen at 26.2%, compared to 10.5% in Anamosa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anamosa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.5% compared to 12.8% in Harlingen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.