Demographics details for Anamosa, IA vs Ephraim, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anamosa, IA vs Ephraim, WI.
| Data | Anamosa | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 5,521 | 346 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 63.9 years |
| Median Income | $55,934 | $72,292 |
| Married Families | 30.0% | 58.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Anamosa vs Ephraim
- In Anamosa, the population is higher at 5,521, compared to 346 in Ephraim.
- The median age in Ephraim is higher at 63.9 years, compared to 42.0 years in Anamosa.
- Ephraim has a higher median income of $72,292, compared to $55,934 in Anamosa.
- In Ephraim, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 30.0% in Anamosa.
- Anamosa has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Anamosa and Ephraim at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Anamosa vs Ephraim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anamosa | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 6 | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 96 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Anamosa vs Ephraim
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Anamosa at 6% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Ephraim at 96% compared to 87% in Anamosa.
- The Asian population is larger in Anamosa at 2% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anamosa at 2% compared to 0% in Ephraim.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Ephraim at 4%, compared to 3% in Anamosa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anamosa and Ephraim at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anamosa | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.0% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 7.7% |
| Depression | 18.7% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 11.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 25.7% |
| Obesity | 45.0% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anamosa vs Ephraim
- More residents in Anamosa report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 12.5% in Ephraim.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Ephraim at 21.1% versus 18.7% in Anamosa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anamosa at 21.1% compared to 11.2% in Ephraim.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Ephraim at 25.7% compared to 21.0% in Anamosa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anamosa at 45.0% compared to 31.7% in Ephraim.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Ephraim at 19.0% compared to 14.0% in Anamosa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anamosa | Ephraim |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (13) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (1,229) | 4.3% (15) |
| Less than High School | 10.5% (581) | 2.3% (8) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.5% (747) | 59.5% (206) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anamosa vs Ephraim
- A higher percentage of residents in Anamosa have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Ephraim.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anamosa hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 4.3% in Ephraim.
- More residents in Anamosa have less than a high school education at 10.5% compared to 2.3% in Ephraim.
- In Ephraim, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 59.5% compared to 13.5% in Anamosa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.