Demographics details for Anaheim, CA vs Grand rapids, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anaheim, CA vs Grand rapids, MI.
| Data | Anaheim | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 344,461 | 196,908 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 31.8 years |
| Median Income | $88,538 | $61,634 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Anaheim vs Grand rapids
- In Anaheim, the population is higher at 344,461, compared to 196,908 in Grand rapids.
- Residents in Anaheim have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 31.8 years in Grand rapids.
- Anaheim has a higher median income of $88,538 compared to $61,634 in Grand rapids.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Anaheim at 37.0% compared to 31.0% in Grand rapids.
- The poverty level is higher in Grand rapids at 14%, compared to 12% in Anaheim.
- Grand rapids has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 4.2% in Anaheim.
Demographics
Demographics Anaheim vs Grand rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anaheim | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 18 |
| White | 8 | 51 |
| Asian | 18 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 54 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 16 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anaheim vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 3% in Anaheim.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grand rapids at 51% compared to 8% in Anaheim.
- The Asian population is larger in Anaheim at 18% compared to 3% in Grand rapids.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Anaheim at 54% compared to 16% in Grand rapids.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Anaheim at 16% compared to 11% in Grand rapids.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Anaheim and Grand rapids at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anaheim | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.6% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 25.3% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.4% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 28.6% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anaheim vs Grand rapids
- In Grand rapids, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.5% in Anaheim.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grand rapids at 25.3% versus 17.3% in Anaheim.
- Grand rapids has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 11.9% in Anaheim.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grand rapids at 16.7% compared to 15.4% in Anaheim.
- Grand rapids has higher obesity rates at 34.9% compared to 28.6% in Anaheim.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grand rapids at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Anaheim.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anaheim | Grand rapids |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 3.2% (10,878) | 1.2% (2,304) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (46,926) | 12.4% (24,420) |
| Less than High School | 28.0% (96,503) | 12.2% (23,971) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.9% (65,019) | 25.6% (50,441) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anaheim vs Grand rapids
- A higher percentage of residents in Anaheim have no formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.2% in Grand rapids.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anaheim hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 12.4% in Grand rapids.
- More residents in Anaheim have less than a high school education at 28.0% compared to 12.2% in Grand rapids.
- In Grand rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.6% compared to 18.9% in Anaheim.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.