Demographics details for Anaconda, MT vs Gardena, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Anaconda, MT vs Gardena, CA.
| Data | Anaconda | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,510 | 58,843 |
| Median Age | 49.6 years | 40.1 years |
| Median Income | $46,436 | $75,443 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.7 |
Population Comparison: Anaconda vs Gardena
- The population in Gardena is higher at 58,843, compared to 9,510 in Anaconda.
- Residents in Anaconda have a higher median age of 49.6 years compared to 40.1 years in Gardena.
- Gardena has a higher median income of $75,443, compared to $46,436 in Anaconda.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Anaconda at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Gardena.
- The poverty level is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 11% in Anaconda.
- Gardena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 3.0% in Anaconda.
Demographics
Demographics Anaconda vs Gardena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Anaconda | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 20 |
| White | 87 | -5 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 25 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 44 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Anaconda vs Gardena
- In Gardena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 1% in Anaconda.
- Anaconda has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to -5% in Gardena.
- In Gardena, the Asian population stands at 25%, greater than 0% in Anaconda.
- Gardena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 44%, compared to 4% in Anaconda.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardena at 15%, compared to 6% in Anaconda.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Anaconda at 2% compared to 1% in Gardena.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Anaconda | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.4% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 24.1% | 13.8% |
| Smoking | 21.1% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.8% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 36.3% | 28.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Anaconda vs Gardena
- More residents in Anaconda report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- Depression is more prevalent in Anaconda at 24.1% compared to 13.8% in Gardena.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Anaconda at 21.1% compared to 11.3% in Gardena.
- Binge drinking is more common in Anaconda at 21.8% compared to 13.5% in Gardena.
- Obesity rates are higher in Anaconda at 36.3% compared to 28.1% in Gardena.
- Disability percentages are higher in Anaconda at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Gardena.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Anaconda | Gardena |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.6% (153) | 3.0% (1,776) |
| High School Diploma | 25.3% (2,409) | 15.0% (8,829) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (1,384) | 26.5% (15,605) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.7% (1,494) | 19.8% (11,669) |
Education Levels Comparison: Anaconda vs Gardena
- In Gardena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.0% compared to 1.6% in Anaconda.
- A higher percentage of residents in Anaconda hold a high school diploma at 25.3% compared to 15.0% in Gardena.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gardena at 26.5%, compared to 14.6% in Anaconda.
- In Gardena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.8% compared to 15.7% in Anaconda.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.