Demographics details for Amo, IN vs Judsonia, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Amo, IN vs Judsonia, AR.
| Data | Amo | Judsonia |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 415 | 1,884 |
| Median Age | 31.7 years | 40.9 years |
| Median Income | $71,932 | $41,232 |
| Married Families | 43.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Amo vs Judsonia
- The population in Judsonia is higher at 1,884, compared to 415 in Amo.
- The median age in Judsonia is higher at 40.9 years, compared to 31.7 years in Amo.
- Amo has a higher median income of $71,932 compared to $41,232 in Judsonia.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Amo at 43.0% compared to 42.0% in Judsonia.
- The poverty level is higher in Judsonia at 12%, compared to 0% in Amo.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Amo and Judsonia at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Amo vs Judsonia provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Amo | Judsonia |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 1 |
| White | 98 | 79 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Amo vs Judsonia
- In Judsonia, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Amo.
- Amo has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 79% in Judsonia.
- Both Amo and Judsonia have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Judsonia has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 1% in Amo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Judsonia at 12%, compared to 1% in Amo.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Amo and Judsonia at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Amo | Judsonia |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.3% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 26.2% | 27.4% |
| Smoking | 19.7% | 26.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.1% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 35.8% | 37.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Amo vs Judsonia
- In Judsonia, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 17.1% in Amo.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Judsonia at 27.4% versus 26.2% in Amo.
- Judsonia has a higher smoking rate at 26.0% compared to 19.7% in Amo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Amo at 17.1% compared to 14.9% in Judsonia.
- Judsonia has higher obesity rates at 37.0% compared to 35.8% in Amo.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Judsonia at 23.0% compared to 12.0% in Amo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Amo | Judsonia |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.3% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 33.0% (137) | 27.0% (509) |
| Less than High School | 9.6% (40) | 31.8% (599) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.6% (40) | 15.7% (296) |
Education Levels Comparison: Amo vs Judsonia
- In Judsonia, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Amo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Amo hold a high school diploma at 33.0% compared to 27.0% in Judsonia.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Judsonia at 31.8%, compared to 9.6% in Amo.
- In Judsonia, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.7% compared to 9.6% in Amo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.