Demographics details for Americus, GA vs Coalinga, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Americus, GA vs Coalinga, CA.
| Data | Americus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,642 | 17,024 |
| Median Age | 29.4 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $36,498 | $68,976 |
| Married Families | 23.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Americus vs Coalinga
- The population in Coalinga is higher at 17,024, compared to 15,642 in Americus.
- The median age in Coalinga is higher at 35.0 years, compared to 29.4 years in Americus.
- Coalinga has a higher median income of $68,976, compared to $36,498 in Americus.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 23.0% in Americus.
- Americus has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 15% in Coalinga.
- Coalinga has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 3.5% in Americus.
Demographics
Demographics Americus vs Coalinga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Americus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 4 |
| White | 28 | 9 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 65 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Americus vs Coalinga
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Americus at 62% compared to 4% in Coalinga.
- Americus has a higher percentage of White residents at 28% compared to 9% in Coalinga.
- In Coalinga, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Americus.
- Coalinga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 65%, compared to 4% in Americus.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Coalinga at 18%, compared to 5% in Americus.
- In Coalinga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Americus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Americus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.0% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.9% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 20.3% | 16.4% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 17.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.4% | 15.9% |
| Obesity | 42.3% | 39.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Americus vs Coalinga
- More residents in Americus report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.9% in Coalinga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Americus at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in Coalinga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Americus at 21.8% compared to 17.2% in Coalinga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Coalinga at 15.9% compared to 12.4% in Americus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Americus at 42.3% compared to 39.1% in Coalinga.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Americus and Coalinga at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Americus | Coalinga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.3% (197) | 3.2% (537) |
| High School Diploma | 18.1% (2,831) | 13.8% (2,349) |
| Less than High School | 10.9% (1,703) | 39.2% (6,672) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 12.6% (1,976) | 8.1% (1,380) |
Education Levels Comparison: Americus vs Coalinga
- In Coalinga, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 1.3% in Americus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Americus hold a high school diploma at 18.1% compared to 13.8% in Coalinga.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Coalinga at 39.2%, compared to 10.9% in Americus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Americus hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 8.1% in Coalinga.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.