Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Woodstock, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Woodstock, IL.

Data American fork Woodstock
Population 37,268 25,665
Median Age 28.0 years 36.3 years
Median Income $90,490 $82,287
Married Families 42.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.7

Population Comparison: American fork vs Woodstock

  • In American fork, the population is higher at 37,268, compared to 25,665 in Woodstock.
  • The median age in Woodstock is higher at 36.3 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $82,287 in Woodstock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 40.0% in Woodstock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Woodstock at 8%, compared to 5% in American fork.
  • Woodstock has a higher unemployment rate at 5.7% compared to 4.2% in American fork.

Demographics

Demographics American fork vs Woodstock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic American fork Woodstock
Black Data is updating 3
White 84 59
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 9 23
Two or More Races 6 13
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 59% in Woodstock.
  • In Woodstock, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in American fork.
  • Woodstock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 9% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woodstock at 13%, compared to 6% in American fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both American fork and Woodstock at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric American fork Woodstock
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 10.7%
Depression 23.4% 20.2%
Smoking 6.7% 15.2%
Binge Drinking 8.5% 17.7%
Obesity 29.5% 32.4%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.3% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in American fork at 23.4% compared to 20.2% in Woodstock.
  • Woodstock has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Woodstock at 17.7% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Woodstock has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Woodstock at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level American fork Woodstock
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 0.9% (237)
High School Diploma 7.4% (2,742) 15.8% (4,047)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,134) 12.9% (3,314)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (7,922) 21.0% (5,381)

Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Woodstock

  • In Woodstock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • In Woodstock, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.8% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Woodstock at 12.9%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in American fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 21.0% in Woodstock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.