Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | American fork | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,268 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $90,490 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: American fork vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
- The median age in Tacoma is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $79,085 in Tacoma.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 36.0% in Tacoma.
- The poverty level is higher in Tacoma at 11%, compared to 5% in American fork.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.2% in American fork.
Demographics
Demographics American fork vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | American fork | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 11 |
| White | 84 | 53 |
| Asian | 1 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 0% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- In Tacoma, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 1% in American fork.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 9% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 6% in American fork.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in American fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | American fork | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 6.7% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.5% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 23.4% in American fork.
- Tacoma has a higher smoking rate at 15.4% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Tacoma at 16.2% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Tacoma has higher obesity rates at 34.6% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | American fork | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (2,742) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (2,134) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (7,922) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- In Tacoma, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.0% compared to 21.3% in American fork.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.