Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Rushville, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Rushville, NE.

Data American fork Rushville
Population 37,268 799
Median Age 28.0 years 42.6 years
Median Income $90,490 $47,180
Married Families 42.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 5% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 2.5

Population Comparison: American fork vs Rushville

  • In American fork, the population is higher at 37,268, compared to 799 in Rushville.
  • The median age in Rushville is higher at 42.6 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $47,180 in Rushville.
  • In Rushville, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 42.0% in American fork.
  • The poverty level is higher in Rushville at 10%, compared to 5% in American fork.
  • The unemployment rate in American fork is higher at 4.2%, compared to 2.5% in Rushville.

Demographics

Demographics American fork vs Rushville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic American fork Rushville
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 84 50
Asian 1 2
Hispanic 9 14
Two or More Races 6 10
American Indian Data is updating 24

Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Rushville

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both American fork and Rushville at 0%.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 50% in Rushville.
  • In Rushville, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in American fork.
  • Rushville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 9% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rushville at 10%, compared to 6% in American fork.
  • In Rushville, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 24%, compared to 0% in American fork.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric American fork Rushville
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 14.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 10.5%
Depression 23.4% 18.0%
Smoking 6.7% 19.3%
Binge Drinking 8.5% 21.0%
Obesity 29.5% 44.1%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 31.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Rushville

  • In Rushville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in American fork at 23.4% compared to 18.0% in Rushville.
  • Rushville has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Rushville at 21.0% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Rushville has higher obesity rates at 44.1% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rushville at 31.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level American fork Rushville
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 0.4% (3)
High School Diploma 7.4% (2,742) 23.7% (189)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,134) 17.3% (138)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (7,922) 21.9% (175)

Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Rushville

  • A higher percentage of residents in American fork have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Rushville.
  • In Rushville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.7% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Rushville at 17.3%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • In Rushville, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 21.3% in American fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.