Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Pea ridge, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Pea ridge, AR.
Data | American fork | Pea ridge |
---|---|---|
Population | 37,268 | 7,852 |
Median Age | 28.0 years | 35.6 years |
Median Income | $90,490 | $93,113 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: American fork vs Pea ridge
- In American fork, the population is higher at 37,268, compared to 7,852 in Pea ridge.
- The median age in Pea ridge is higher at 35.6 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- Pea ridge has a higher median income of $93,113, compared to $90,490 in American fork.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both American fork and Pea ridge at 42.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Pea ridge at 8%, compared to 5% in American fork.
- The unemployment rate in American fork is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Pea ridge.
Demographics
Demographics American fork vs Pea ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | American fork | Pea ridge |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 4 |
White | 84 | 70 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 9 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 70% in Pea ridge.
- Both American fork and Pea ridge have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both American fork and Pea ridge at 9%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pea ridge at 15%, compared to 6% in American fork.
- In Pea ridge, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in American fork.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | American fork | Pea ridge |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 11.7% |
Depression | 23.4% | 25.0% |
Smoking | 6.7% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 8.5% | 17.0% |
Obesity | 29.5% | 34.8% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Pea ridge
- In Pea ridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.0% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Pea ridge at 25.0% versus 23.4% in American fork.
- Pea ridge has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Pea ridge at 17.0% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Pea ridge has higher obesity rates at 34.8% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pea ridge at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | American fork | Pea ridge |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 0.3% (23) |
High School Diploma | 7.4% (2,742) | 17.7% (1,390) |
Less than High School | 5.7% (2,134) | 9.8% (773) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (7,922) | 14.4% (1,131) |
Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Pea ridge
- A higher percentage of residents in American fork have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Pea ridge.
- In Pea ridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.7% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pea ridge at 9.8%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in American fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 14.4% in Pea ridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.