Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Lawrence, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Lawrence, MA.
| Data | American fork | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,268 | 87,954 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $90,490 | $53,977 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: American fork vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 87,954, compared to 37,268 in American fork.
- The median age in Lawrence is higher at 31.5 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $53,977 in Lawrence.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 26.0% in Lawrence.
- The poverty level is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 5% in American fork.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 4.2% in American fork.
Demographics
Demographics American fork vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | American fork | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 84 | -4 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 82 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in American fork.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 82%, compared to 9% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 6% in American fork.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both American fork and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | American fork | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 6.7% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.5% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in American fork at 23.4% compared to 22.4% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 14.5% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Lawrence has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lawrence at 14.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | American fork | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 2.7% (2,366) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (2,742) | 18.6% (16,316) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (2,134) | 34.1% (29,963) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (7,922) | 9.2% (8,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- In Lawrence, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawrence at 34.1%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in American fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.