Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Forest, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Forest, MS.
| Data | American fork | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 37,268 | 5,330 |
| Median Age | 28.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $90,490 | $50,093 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: American fork vs Forest
- In American fork, the population is higher at 37,268, compared to 5,330 in Forest.
- The median age in Forest is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
- American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $50,093 in Forest.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Forest.
- The poverty level is higher in Forest at 18%, compared to 5% in American fork.
- Forest has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.2% in American fork.
Demographics
Demographics American fork vs Forest provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | American fork | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 43 |
| White | 84 | 24 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 9 | 30 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Forest
- In Forest, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 43% compared to 0% in American fork.
- American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 24% in Forest.
- The Asian population is larger in American fork at 1% compared to 0% in Forest.
- Forest has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 9% in American fork.
- More residents identify as two or more races in American fork at 6% compared to 3% in Forest.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both American fork and Forest at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | American fork | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.2% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.8% | 16.8% |
| Depression | 23.4% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 6.7% | 26.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 8.5% | 11.8% |
| Obesity | 29.5% | 45.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Forest
- In Forest, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
- Depression is more prevalent in American fork at 23.4% compared to 21.2% in Forest.
- Forest has a higher smoking rate at 26.1% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Forest at 11.8% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
- Forest has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Forest at 20.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | American fork | Forest |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (208) | 4.4% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 7.4% (2,742) | 10.5% (557) |
| Less than High School | 5.7% (2,134) | 33.4% (1,779) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.3% (7,922) | 8.5% (455) |
Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Forest
- In Forest, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.4% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
- In Forest, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.5% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Forest at 33.4%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
- A higher percentage of residents in American fork hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 8.5% in Forest.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.