Demographics details for American fork, UT vs Apalachicola, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in American fork, UT vs Apalachicola, FL.

Data American fork Apalachicola
Population 37,268 2,395
Median Age 28.0 years 53.8 years
Median Income $90,490 $61,322
Married Families 42.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 4.0

Population Comparison: American fork vs Apalachicola

  • In American fork, the population is higher at 37,268, compared to 2,395 in Apalachicola.
  • The median age in Apalachicola is higher at 53.8 years, compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490 compared to $61,322 in Apalachicola.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in American fork at 42.0% compared to 35.0% in Apalachicola.
  • The poverty level is higher in Apalachicola at 18%, compared to 5% in American fork.
  • The unemployment rate in American fork is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Apalachicola.

Demographics

Demographics American fork vs Apalachicola provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic American fork Apalachicola
Black Data is updating 27
White 84 65
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 9 2
Two or More Races 6 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: American fork vs Apalachicola

  • In Apalachicola, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 27% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of White residents at 84% compared to 65% in Apalachicola.
  • Both American fork and Apalachicola have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in American fork at 9% compared to 2% in Apalachicola.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in American fork at 6% compared to 5% in Apalachicola.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both American fork and Apalachicola at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric American fork Apalachicola
Mental Health Not Good 14.2% 17.4%
Physical Health Not Good 9.8% 12.1%
Depression 23.4% 19.8%
Smoking 6.7% 20.1%
Binge Drinking 8.5% 15.3%
Obesity 29.5% 37.8%
Disability Percentage 8.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: American fork vs Apalachicola

  • In Apalachicola, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in American fork at 23.4% compared to 19.8% in Apalachicola.
  • Apalachicola has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Apalachicola at 15.3% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Apalachicola has higher obesity rates at 37.8% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Apalachicola at 30.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level American fork Apalachicola
No Schooling 0.6% (208) 1.0% (25)
High School Diploma 7.4% (2,742) 19.2% (461)
Less than High School 5.7% (2,134) 29.5% (707)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.3% (7,922) 26.2% (627)

Education Levels Comparison: American fork vs Apalachicola

  • In Apalachicola, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • In Apalachicola, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Apalachicola at 29.5%, compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • In Apalachicola, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.2% compared to 21.3% in American fork.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.