Demographics details for Amarillo, TX vs Sitka, AK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Amarillo, TX vs Sitka, AK.
| Data | Amarillo | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 201,291 | 8,382 |
| Median Age | 34.4 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $60,628 | $95,261 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 14% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.3 |
Population Comparison: Amarillo vs Sitka
- In Amarillo, the population is higher at 201,291, compared to 8,382 in Sitka.
- The median age in Sitka is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 34.4 years in Amarillo.
- Sitka has a higher median income of $95,261, compared to $60,628 in Amarillo.
- In Sitka, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 38.0% in Amarillo.
- Amarillo has a higher poverty level at 14% compared to 8% in Sitka.
- The unemployment rate in Amarillo is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Sitka.
Demographics
Demographics Amarillo vs Sitka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Amarillo | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 7 | 1 |
| White | 43 | 57 |
| Asian | 4 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 34 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 9 |
Demographics Comparison: Amarillo vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Amarillo at 7% compared to 1% in Sitka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sitka at 57% compared to 43% in Amarillo.
- In Sitka, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 4% in Amarillo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Amarillo at 34% compared to 7% in Sitka.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Sitka at 18%, compared to 11% in Amarillo.
- In Sitka, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 9%, compared to 1% in Amarillo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Amarillo | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.2% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.5% | 18.7% |
| Smoking | 18.2% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 19.3% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 31.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Amarillo vs Sitka
- More residents in Amarillo report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 14.6% in Sitka.
- Depression is more prevalent in Amarillo at 23.5% compared to 18.7% in Sitka.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Amarillo at 18.2% compared to 16.4% in Sitka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sitka at 19.3% compared to 18.1% in Amarillo.
- Obesity rates are higher in Amarillo at 39.7% compared to 31.7% in Sitka.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sitka at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Amarillo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Amarillo | Sitka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.7% (3,337) | 0.4% (33) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (27,602) | 16.7% (1,396) |
| Less than High School | 15.8% (31,837) | 5.8% (486) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.1% (32,339) | 24.8% (2,076) |
Education Levels Comparison: Amarillo vs Sitka
- A higher percentage of residents in Amarillo have no formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.4% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.7% compared to 13.7% in Amarillo.
- More residents in Amarillo have less than a high school education at 15.8% compared to 5.8% in Sitka.
- In Sitka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 16.1% in Amarillo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.