Demographics details for Alum creek, WV vs New tripoli, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Alum creek, WV vs New tripoli, PA.

Data Alum creek New tripoli
Population 1,420 898
Median Age 47.4 years 42.0 years
Median Income $65,179 $80,000
Married Families 54.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Alum creek vs New tripoli

  • In Alum creek, the population is higher at 1,420, compared to 898 in New tripoli.
  • Residents in Alum creek have a higher median age of 47.4 years compared to 42.0 years in New tripoli.
  • New tripoli has a higher median income of $80,000, compared to $65,179 in Alum creek.
  • In New tripoli, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 54.0% in Alum creek.
  • Alum creek has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in New tripoli.
  • The unemployment rate in Alum creek is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in New tripoli.

Demographics

Demographics Alum creek vs New tripoli provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Alum creek New tripoli
Black Data is updating Data is updating
White 100 100
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic Data is updating Data is updating
Two or More Races Data is updating Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Alum creek vs New tripoli

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Alum creek and New tripoli at 0%.
  • The percentage of White residents is the same in both Alum creek and New tripoli at 100%.
  • Both Alum creek and New tripoli have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Alum creek and New tripoli at 0%.
  • Both Alum creek and New tripoli have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alum creek and New tripoli at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Alum creek New tripoli
Mental Health Not Good 20.2% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 13.5% Data is updating%
Depression 29.5% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 40.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 30.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Alum creek vs New tripoli

  • More residents in Alum creek report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Alum creek at 29.5% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Alum creek at 20.6% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Alum creek at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Alum creek at 40.1% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Alum creek New tripoli
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 34.9% (496) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 8.9% (126) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.7% (138) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Alum creek vs New tripoli

  • The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Alum creek and New tripoli at 0.0%.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alum creek hold a high school diploma at 34.9% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • More residents in Alum creek have less than a high school education at 8.9% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alum creek hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.7% compared to 0.0% in New tripoli.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.