Demographics details for Altoona, AL vs Washington, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Altoona, AL vs Washington, IN.
Data | Altoona | Washington |
---|---|---|
Population | 941 | 12,171 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $38,750 | $48,255 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Altoona vs Washington
- The population in Washington is higher at 12,171, compared to 941 in Altoona.
- Residents in Altoona have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.0 years in Washington.
- Washington has a higher median income of $48,255, compared to $38,750 in Altoona.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Altoona at 51.0% compared to 38.0% in Washington.
- Altoona has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Washington.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Altoona and Washington at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Altoona vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Altoona | Washington |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 4 |
White | 90 | 76 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 4 | 12 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Altoona vs Washington
- In Washington, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Altoona.
- Altoona has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 76% in Washington.
- Both Altoona and Washington have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Washington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 4% in Altoona.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 3% in Altoona.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Altoona at 1% compared to 0% in Washington.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Altoona | Washington |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 22.1% | 18.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.5% |
Depression | 28.1% | 27.6% |
Smoking | 23.3% | 23.3% |
Binge Drinking | 15.1% | 16.3% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 36.4% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Altoona vs Washington
- More residents in Altoona report poor mental health at 22.1% compared to 18.7% in Washington.
- Depression is more prevalent in Altoona at 28.1% compared to 27.6% in Washington.
- Smoking rates are the same in both Altoona and Washington at 23.3%.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 16.3% compared to 15.1% in Altoona.
- Obesity rates are higher in Altoona at 39.7% compared to 36.4% in Washington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Altoona at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Washington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Altoona | Washington |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.0% (9) | 1.3% (163) |
High School Diploma | 47.4% (446) | 22.8% (2,771) |
Less than High School | 31.9% (300) | 20.2% (2,460) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.9% (93) | 9.3% (1,129) |
Education Levels Comparison: Altoona vs Washington
- In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 1.0% in Altoona.
- A higher percentage of residents in Altoona hold a high school diploma at 47.4% compared to 22.8% in Washington.
- More residents in Altoona have less than a high school education at 31.9% compared to 20.2% in Washington.
- A higher percentage of residents in Altoona hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 9.9% compared to 9.3% in Washington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.