Demographics details for Altavista, VA vs Central point, OR

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Altavista, VA vs Central point, OR.

Data Altavista Central point
Population 3,329 19,222
Median Age 41.6 years 40.3 years
Median Income $39,761 $79,731
Married Families 37.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 15% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.5

Population Comparison: Altavista vs Central point

  • The population in Central point is higher at 19,222, compared to 3,329 in Altavista.
  • Residents in Altavista have a higher median age of 41.6 years compared to 40.3 years in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher median income of $79,731, compared to $39,761 in Altavista.
  • In Central point, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 37.0% in Altavista.
  • Altavista has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 10% in Central point.
  • Central point has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.3% in Altavista.

Demographics

Demographics Altavista vs Central point provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Altavista Central point
Black 31 Data is updating
White 63 76
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 2 15
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Altavista vs Central point

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Altavista at 31% compared to 0% in Central point.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central point at 76% compared to 63% in Altavista.
  • In Central point, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Altavista.
  • Central point has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 15%, compared to 2% in Altavista.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Central point at 7%, compared to 4% in Altavista.
  • In Central point, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Altavista.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Altavista Central point
Mental Health Not Good 20.9% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.2% 12.0%
Depression 25.4% 29.4%
Smoking 24.7% 16.7%
Binge Drinking 14.1% 16.5%
Obesity 39.2% 30.1%
Disability Percentage 16.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Altavista vs Central point

  • More residents in Altavista report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.4% in Central point.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central point at 29.4% versus 25.4% in Altavista.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Altavista at 24.7% compared to 16.7% in Central point.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central point at 16.5% compared to 14.1% in Altavista.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Altavista at 39.2% compared to 30.1% in Central point.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Altavista at 16.0% compared to 11.0% in Central point.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Altavista Central point
No Schooling 0.6% (20) 1.7% (319)
High School Diploma 18.8% (625) 16.1% (3,095)
Less than High School 13.7% (457) 13.2% (2,530)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 21.1% (703) 15.6% (3,003)

Education Levels Comparison: Altavista vs Central point

  • In Central point, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.6% in Altavista.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Altavista hold a high school diploma at 18.8% compared to 16.1% in Central point.
  • More residents in Altavista have less than a high school education at 13.7% compared to 13.2% in Central point.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Altavista hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.1% compared to 15.6% in Central point.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.