Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Trumann, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Trumann, AR.
| Data | Alpharetta | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,267 | 7,305 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 40.0 years |
| Median Income | $141,402 | $37,618 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Trumann
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 7,305 in Trumann.
- Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 40.0 years in Trumann.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $37,618 in Trumann.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 35.0% in Trumann.
- The poverty level is higher in Trumann at 13%, compared to 6% in Alpharetta.
- Trumann has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Trumann provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alpharetta | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 5 |
| White | 55 | 84 |
| Asian | 22 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Trumann
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 5% in Trumann.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Trumann at 84% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 0% in Trumann.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alpharetta at 7% compared to 3% in Trumann.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Trumann at 8%, compared to 5% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Trumann at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alpharetta | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 20.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 28.5% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 23.0% | 44.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Trumann at 28.5% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Trumann has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- Binge drinking is more common in Alpharetta at 17.7% compared to 14.4% in Trumann.
- Trumann has higher obesity rates at 44.6% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Trumann at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alpharetta | Trumann |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 1.8% (135) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 25.9% (1,895) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 24.4% (1,780) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 6.7% (487) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Trumann
- In Trumann, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.9% in Alpharetta.
- In Trumann, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Trumann at 24.4%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 6.7% in Trumann.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.