Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Shrub oak, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Shrub oak, NY.
| Data | Alpharetta | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,267 | 3,002 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 36.6 years |
| Median Income | $141,402 | $128,832 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Shrub oak
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 36.6 years in Shrub oak.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $128,832 in Shrub oak.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 38.0% in Shrub oak.
- Alpharetta has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Shrub oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alpharetta | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 2 |
| White | 55 | 64 |
| Asian | 22 | 15 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Shrub oak at 64% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 15% in Shrub oak.
- Shrub oak has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Alpharetta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alpharetta at 5% compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Shrub oak at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alpharetta | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 23.0% | 25.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Shrub oak
- In Shrub oak, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 13.2% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shrub oak at 19.7% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Shrub oak has a higher smoking rate at 11.3% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 17.7% in Alpharetta.
- Shrub oak has higher obesity rates at 25.7% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shrub oak at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alpharetta | Shrub oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 0.4% (13) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 11.0% (330) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 12.9% (387) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 38.9% (1,168) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Shrub oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Shrub oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 11.0% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shrub oak at 12.9%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 38.9% in Shrub oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.