Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Mukilteo, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Mukilteo, WA.
| Data | Alpharetta | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,267 | 21,096 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $141,402 | $123,036 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Mukilteo
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 21,096 in Mukilteo.
- The median age in Mukilteo is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 40.6 years in Alpharetta.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $123,036 in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Alpharetta and Mukilteo at 48.0%.
- Alpharetta has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Mukilteo.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Alpharetta and Mukilteo at 3.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Mukilteo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alpharetta | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 1 |
| White | 55 | 61 |
| Asian | 22 | 21 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 1% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mukilteo at 61% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 21% in Mukilteo.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alpharetta at 7% compared to 6% in Mukilteo.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mukilteo at 11%, compared to 5% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Mukilteo at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alpharetta | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 8.9% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 9.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 23.0% | 29.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Mukilteo
- In Mukilteo, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.6% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mukilteo at 26.5% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alpharetta at 9.4% compared to 9.3% in Mukilteo.
- Binge drinking is more common in Alpharetta at 17.7% compared to 15.7% in Mukilteo.
- Mukilteo has higher obesity rates at 29.2% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mukilteo at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alpharetta | Mukilteo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 0.1% (24) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 9.7% (2,042) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 2.0% (414) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 38.3% (8,089) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Mukilteo
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Mukilteo.
- In Mukilteo, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.7% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- More residents in Alpharetta have less than a high school education at 3.9% compared to 2.0% in Mukilteo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 38.3% in Mukilteo.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.