Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Junction city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Junction city, KS.

Data Alpharetta Junction city
Population 67,267 22,264
Median Age 40.6 years 28.5 years
Median Income $141,402 $60,709
Married Families 48.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 6% 13%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 4.8

Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Junction city

  • In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 22,264 in Junction city.
  • Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
  • Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Junction city.
  • The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 6% in Alpharetta.
  • Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.

Demographics

Demographics Alpharetta vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Alpharetta Junction city
Black 11 20
White 55 43
Asian 22 3
Hispanic 7 18
Two or More Races 5 15
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 11% in Alpharetta.
  • Alpharetta has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 43% in Junction city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 3% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 7% in Alpharetta.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 5% in Alpharetta.
  • In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Alpharetta.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Alpharetta Junction city
Mental Health Not Good 12.1% 17.1%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% 11.0%
Depression 17.3% 19.2%
Smoking 9.4% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 17.7% 16.6%
Obesity 23.0% 41.8%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Junction city at 19.2% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
  • Junction city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Alpharetta at 17.7% compared to 16.6% in Junction city.
  • Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Alpharetta Junction city
No Schooling 0.9% (602) 1.0% (216)
High School Diploma 4.7% (3,172) 12.4% (2,755)
Less than High School 3.9% (2,597) 6.9% (1,535)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.9% (32,211) 13.2% (2,941)

Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Junction city

  • In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.9% in Alpharetta.
  • In Junction city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Junction city at 6.9%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.