Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Grove city, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Grove city, OH.
Data | Alpharetta | Grove city |
---|---|---|
Population | 67,267 | 42,233 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 40.6 years |
Median Income | $141,402 | $84,765 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Grove city
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 42,233 in Grove city.
- The median age is the same in both Alpharetta and Grove city at 40.6 years.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $84,765 in Grove city.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in Grove city.
- The poverty level is higher in Grove city at 7%, compared to 6% in Alpharetta.
- Grove city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Grove city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Alpharetta | Grove city |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 4 |
White | 55 | 86 |
Asian | 22 | 3 |
Hispanic | 7 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Grove city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 4% in Grove city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Grove city at 86% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 3% in Grove city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alpharetta at 7% compared to 3% in Grove city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alpharetta at 5% compared to 4% in Grove city.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Grove city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Alpharetta | Grove city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 10.1% |
Depression | 17.3% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 16.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 20.7% |
Obesity | 23.0% | 33.1% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Grove city
- In Grove city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Grove city at 25.1% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Grove city has a higher smoking rate at 16.5% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Grove city at 20.7% compared to 17.7% in Alpharetta.
- Grove city has higher obesity rates at 33.1% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Grove city at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Alpharetta | Grove city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 0.7% (302) |
High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 18.7% (7,916) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 8.5% (3,598) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 22.9% (9,679) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Grove city
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Grove city.
- In Grove city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.7% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Grove city at 8.5%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 22.9% in Grove city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.