Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Folsom, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Folsom, PA.
| Data | Alpharetta | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 67,267 | 8,535 |
| Median Age | 40.6 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $141,402 | $95,048 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Folsom
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 8,535 in Folsom.
- Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 37.5 years in Folsom.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $95,048 in Folsom.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 41.0% in Folsom.
- Alpharetta has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alpharetta | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 5 |
| White | 55 | 89 |
| Asian | 22 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 89% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 0% in Folsom.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alpharetta at 7% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alpharetta at 5% compared to 2% in Folsom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alpharetta | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 17.3% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 9.4% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 23.0% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Folsom at 22.1% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Folsom has a higher smoking rate at 16.1% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 18.5% compared to 17.7% in Alpharetta.
- Folsom has higher obesity rates at 31.2% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Folsom at 10.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alpharetta | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 0.8% (71) |
| High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 19.2% (1,635) |
| Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 10.1% (860) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 20.5% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.8% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.2% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Folsom at 10.1%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 20.5% in Folsom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.