Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Cypress inn, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Cypress inn, TN.

Data Alpharetta Cypress inn
Population 67,267 149
Median Age 40.6 years 36.0 years
Median Income $141,402 $45,000
Married Families 48.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 6% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Cypress inn

  • In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 149 in Cypress inn.
  • Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 36.0 years in Cypress inn.
  • Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $45,000 in Cypress inn.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in Cypress inn.
  • The poverty level is higher in Cypress inn at 12%, compared to 6% in Alpharetta.
  • Cypress inn has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Alpharetta.

Demographics

Demographics Alpharetta vs Cypress inn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Alpharetta Cypress inn
Black 11 5
White 55 90
Asian 22 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 3
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Cypress inn

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 5% in Cypress inn.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cypress inn at 90% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
  • The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 0% in Cypress inn.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Alpharetta at 7% compared to 3% in Cypress inn.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Alpharetta at 5% compared to 2% in Cypress inn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Cypress inn at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Alpharetta Cypress inn
Mental Health Not Good 12.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 7.6% Data is updating%
Depression 17.3% Data is updating%
Smoking 9.4% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 17.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 23.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 6.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Cypress inn

  • More residents in Alpharetta report poor mental health at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Alpharetta at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Alpharetta at 9.4% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Alpharetta at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Alpharetta at 23.0% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Alpharetta at 6.0% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Alpharetta Cypress inn
No Schooling 0.9% (602) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 4.7% (3,172) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 3.9% (2,597) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 47.9% (32,211) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Cypress inn

  • A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a high school diploma at 4.7% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • More residents in Alpharetta have less than a high school education at 3.9% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 0.0% in Cypress inn.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.