Demographics details for Alpharetta, GA vs Beaver dam, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alpharetta, GA vs Beaver dam, WI.
Data | Alpharetta | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Population | 67,267 | 16,582 |
Median Age | 40.6 years | 40.4 years |
Median Income | $141,402 | $65,802 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Alpharetta vs Beaver dam
- In Alpharetta, the population is higher at 67,267, compared to 16,582 in Beaver dam.
- Residents in Alpharetta have a higher median age of 40.6 years compared to 40.4 years in Beaver dam.
- Alpharetta has a higher median income of $141,402 compared to $65,802 in Beaver dam.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alpharetta at 48.0% compared to 35.0% in Beaver dam.
- Alpharetta has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Beaver dam.
- The unemployment rate in Alpharetta is higher at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Beaver dam.
Demographics
Demographics Alpharetta vs Beaver dam provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Alpharetta | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Black | 11 | 3 |
White | 55 | 81 |
Asian | 22 | 2 |
Hispanic | 7 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Alpharetta at 11% compared to 3% in Beaver dam.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Beaver dam at 81% compared to 55% in Alpharetta.
- The Asian population is larger in Alpharetta at 22% compared to 2% in Beaver dam.
- Beaver dam has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaver dam at 6%, compared to 5% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alpharetta and Beaver dam at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Alpharetta | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 12.1% | 15.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.6% | 10.6% |
Depression | 17.3% | 23.6% |
Smoking | 9.4% | 17.6% |
Binge Drinking | 17.7% | 23.5% |
Obesity | 23.0% | 36.6% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alpharetta vs Beaver dam
- In Beaver dam, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.7% compared to 12.1% in Alpharetta.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Beaver dam at 23.6% versus 17.3% in Alpharetta.
- Beaver dam has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 9.4% in Alpharetta.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaver dam at 23.5% compared to 17.7% in Alpharetta.
- Beaver dam has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 23.0% in Alpharetta.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Beaver dam at 11.0% compared to 6.0% in Alpharetta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Alpharetta | Beaver dam |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (602) | 0.3% (47) |
High School Diploma | 4.7% (3,172) | 23.8% (3,947) |
Less than High School | 3.9% (2,597) | 10.3% (1,706) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 47.9% (32,211) | 18.2% (3,023) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alpharetta vs Beaver dam
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Beaver dam.
- In Beaver dam, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 4.7% in Alpharetta.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Beaver dam at 10.3%, compared to 3.9% in Alpharetta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alpharetta hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 47.9% compared to 18.2% in Beaver dam.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.