Demographics details for Alhambra, CA vs Warner robins, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alhambra, CA vs Warner robins, GA.
Data | Alhambra | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Population | 80,259 | 82,175 |
Median Age | 41.1 years | 32.4 years |
Median Income | $80,234 | $63,678 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 13% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.9 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Alhambra vs Warner robins
- The population in Warner robins is higher at 82,175, compared to 80,259 in Alhambra.
- Residents in Alhambra have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 32.4 years in Warner robins.
- Alhambra has a higher median income of $80,234 compared to $63,678 in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Alhambra at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Warner robins.
- Alhambra has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 8% in Warner robins.
- The unemployment rate in Alhambra is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.8% in Warner robins.
Demographics
Demographics Alhambra vs Warner robins provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Alhambra | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 40 |
White | -2 | 42 |
Asian | 53 | 3 |
Hispanic | 36 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 7 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Alhambra vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 40% compared to 3% in Alhambra.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Warner robins at 42% compared to -2% in Alhambra.
- The Asian population is larger in Alhambra at 53% compared to 3% in Warner robins.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Alhambra at 36% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Alhambra at 9% compared to 7% in Warner robins.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Alhambra and Warner robins at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Alhambra | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 13.1% |
Depression | 12.2% | 22.1% |
Smoking | 9.7% | 18.6% |
Binge Drinking | 11.9% | 15.9% |
Obesity | 21.7% | 39.9% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alhambra vs Warner robins
- In Warner robins, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Alhambra.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Warner robins at 22.1% versus 12.2% in Alhambra.
- Warner robins has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 9.7% in Alhambra.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Warner robins at 15.9% compared to 11.9% in Alhambra.
- Warner robins has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 21.7% in Alhambra.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Warner robins at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Alhambra.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Alhambra | Warner robins |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.2% (3,333) | 0.4% (335) |
High School Diploma | 15.0% (12,003) | 14.9% (12,260) |
Less than High School | 17.1% (13,697) | 7.0% (5,714) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 29.7% (23,804) | 19.2% (15,752) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alhambra vs Warner robins
- A higher percentage of residents in Alhambra have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.4% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alhambra hold a high school diploma at 15.0% compared to 14.9% in Warner robins.
- More residents in Alhambra have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 7.0% in Warner robins.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alhambra hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 19.2% in Warner robins.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.