Demographics details for Alhambra, CA vs Falling waters, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Alhambra, CA vs Falling waters, WV.

Data Alhambra Falling waters
Population 80,259 2,150
Median Age 41.1 years 32.2 years
Median Income $80,234 $84,038
Married Families 42.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 13% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.9 3.5

Population Comparison: Alhambra vs Falling waters

  • In Alhambra, the population is higher at 80,259, compared to 2,150 in Falling waters.
  • Residents in Alhambra have a higher median age of 41.1 years compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038, compared to $80,234 in Alhambra.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Alhambra at 42.0% compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • Alhambra has a higher poverty level at 13% compared to 9% in Falling waters.
  • The unemployment rate in Alhambra is higher at 4.9%, compared to 3.5% in Falling waters.

Demographics

Demographics Alhambra vs Falling waters provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Alhambra Falling waters
Black 3 6
White -2 92
Asian 53 Data is updating
Hispanic 36 Data is updating
Two or More Races 9 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Alhambra vs Falling waters

  • In Falling waters, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Alhambra.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falling waters at 92% compared to -2% in Alhambra.
  • The Asian population is larger in Alhambra at 53% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Alhambra at 36% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Alhambra at 9% compared to 2% in Falling waters.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Alhambra at 1% compared to 0% in Falling waters.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Alhambra Falling waters
Mental Health Not Good 13.2% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 11.9%
Depression 12.2% 25.7%
Smoking 9.7% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 11.9% 15.2%
Obesity 21.7% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Alhambra vs Falling waters

  • In Falling waters, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 13.2% in Alhambra.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Falling waters at 25.7% versus 12.2% in Alhambra.
  • Falling waters has a higher smoking rate at 18.7% compared to 9.7% in Alhambra.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falling waters at 15.2% compared to 11.9% in Alhambra.
  • Falling waters has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 21.7% in Alhambra.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falling waters at 24.0% compared to 10.0% in Alhambra.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Alhambra Falling waters
No Schooling 4.2% (3,333) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 15.0% (12,003) 22.4% (482)
Less than High School 17.1% (13,697) 4.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 29.7% (23,804) 11.0% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Alhambra vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of residents in Alhambra have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 15.0% in Alhambra.
  • More residents in Alhambra have less than a high school education at 17.1% compared to 4.7% in Falling waters.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Alhambra hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 29.7% compared to 11.0% in Falling waters.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.