Demographics details for Alcoa, TN vs Junction city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Alcoa, TN vs Junction city, KS.
| Data | Alcoa | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,803 | 22,264 |
| Median Age | 36.3 years | 28.5 years |
| Median Income | $63,580 | $60,709 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Alcoa vs Junction city
- The population in Junction city is higher at 22,264, compared to 11,803 in Alcoa.
- Residents in Alcoa have a higher median age of 36.3 years compared to 28.5 years in Junction city.
- Alcoa has a higher median income of $63,580 compared to $60,709 in Junction city.
- In Junction city, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 35.0% in Alcoa.
- The poverty level is higher in Junction city at 13%, compared to 10% in Alcoa.
- Junction city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 3.2% in Alcoa.
Demographics
Demographics Alcoa vs Junction city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Alcoa | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 10 | 20 |
| White | 70 | 43 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Alcoa vs Junction city
- In Junction city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 10% in Alcoa.
- Alcoa has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 43% in Junction city.
- In Junction city, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Alcoa.
- Junction city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 9% in Alcoa.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Junction city at 15%, compared to 9% in Alcoa.
- In Junction city, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Alcoa.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Alcoa | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.6% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 19.2% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 18.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.0% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 35.4% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Alcoa vs Junction city
- More residents in Alcoa report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.1% in Junction city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Alcoa at 27.9% compared to 19.2% in Junction city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Alcoa at 21.8% compared to 18.5% in Junction city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Junction city at 16.6% compared to 14.0% in Alcoa.
- Junction city has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 35.4% in Alcoa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Junction city at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Alcoa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Alcoa | Junction city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (62) | 1.0% (216) |
| High School Diploma | 19.2% (2,272) | 12.4% (2,755) |
| Less than High School | 13.0% (1,531) | 6.9% (1,535) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.0% (2,481) | 13.2% (2,941) |
Education Levels Comparison: Alcoa vs Junction city
- In Junction city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.5% in Alcoa.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alcoa hold a high school diploma at 19.2% compared to 12.4% in Junction city.
- More residents in Alcoa have less than a high school education at 13.0% compared to 6.9% in Junction city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Alcoa hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.0% compared to 13.2% in Junction city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.